Recommended Reading

December 22, 2009

(Guest post by Jonathan Butcher)

Enemies of the People: My family’s journey to America, by Kati Marton (2009).

George Orwell’s 1984 is an epoch of dystopian storytelling.  Dozens of books and movies have tried since to recreate the idea of an oppressive, conspiratorial state and the overmatched citizens who attempt to free themselves.  From similar novels, such as Man in the High Castle, to recent films such as The Matrix and V for Vendetta, plotlines have morphed over the years, but the general concept is the same.

Nothing is recycled about Kati Marton’s life, however, and Hungarian oppression was real; she lived 1984.  Enemies of the People is her family’s biography of living, being hunted and captured, and, finally, escaping the brutal yet vulnerable totalitarian regime of post-World War II Hungary.  While the country’s leadership was feared by Hungarians, we are told a complex tale of how international pressures and varying levels of Soviet influence kept leaders looking over their shoulders in an attempt to gain political advantage, either from the West or the East.

The Marton’s knew every detail.  Kati’s parents were correspondents for the Associated Press and UP (what would become UPI) and had more access than any other reporters to both the American presence in Budapest and national leadership.  In fact, shortly before his arrest, Endre Marton, Kati’s father, had a memorable face-to-face confrontation with “Stalinist stooge” Matyas Rakosi, then in power.  Rakosi was well aware of the Martons’ reputation for keeping the West appraised of the oppression in Hungary: “Why should I talk to you?  You won’t write the truth anyway.”  Not Rakosi’s truth, certainly.  Endre and his wife, Ilona, were valuable assets for Western press outlets and well-known in press rooms.  The New York Times’s front-page articles on the Marton’s imprisonment were embarrassing to the Rakosi regime and critical to the pair’s release.  The Marton’s would be recognized for their courageous reporting after the Soviet resurgence in Hungary with the George Polk Memorial Award in 1957.

There are some distractions from the spy games in Enemies.  Kati is honest about her parents’ flaws, but she is also warmly candid on the way in which imprisonment strengthened—and even may have saved—Endre and Ilona’s marriage.  What happened to Kati and her sister, Julia, while their parents were in prison is told with a cold stare; she is not bitter, but the pain is almost too much to describe with any emotion.

Three plot elements kept me turning pages in Enemies: first, Kati knew almost nothing of the espionage going on during her childhood, and Enemies allows one to re-live Kati’s childhood along with her as she uncovers the AVO (secret police) files on her family.  She was blissfully ignorant of the grim details surrounding her parents’ knowledge of and attempts to avoid AVO surveillance and capture.  Second, the events of her parents’ separate arrests, their release one year later, and their daring escape with their daughters in the middle of the night, dodging Soviet tanks along the way, makes for gripping reading.

Third, and most importantly, Enemies of the People is a reminder that the United States is unique.  Freedom is a gift, and people recognize when they do not have it and so will chase it.  The Marton’s story is a sophisticated one, involving betrayal and espionage but also periods of calm and hopeful expectation of a better life.  Yet amidst the details, Kati Marton cannot help but emphasize that her parents knew the American way of life was free of the fear and despondency in Hungary.  Freedom of thought, speech and responsible action were absolutely vital to the Marton’s, and for as long as they could, they practiced these things in Hungary until they had no choice but to flee.

Throughout the book there is a hopeful thought that persists with the reader but goes unspoken by the Marton’s: there is always America.  If things become unbearable (which they did), or if Endre and Ilona are ever released (they finally were), they could always turn to their contacts in America and try to escape.  And when they reached America, they would be safe—the Marton’s were convinced of this.  As long as there was America, there was hope.


Pass the Popcorn: Avatar’s Preachy Foreign Policy

December 21, 2009

(Spoiler Alert!)

Avatar looks cool.  Really, really cool.  But that can’t make up for a predictable plot with remarkably little emotional connection to the oddly under-developed characters (despite a nearly 3 hour running time).  And worst of all, Avatar is filled with preachy, anti-American foreign policy themes.  If I wanted that I could just read the New York Times.

I’m surprised more reviewers have not picked up on and been irritated by the heavy-handed politics.  It’s right there.  Humans have a colony on the planet Pandora to extract the valuable mineral, unobtainium (yes, that is really its name).  The alien indigenous people (and in this case they really are indigenous) are in the way of greedy corporate profits because their giant tree home sits on top of a huge mineral deposit, so the military slaughters them.  Our hero uses a remote-controlled alien body (his avatar) to spy on the natives but eventually sees their superiority, falls in love, and leads them in fighting against the humans.

Translation for those who are hard of thinking: Greedy oil companies get the military to invade Iraq and kill the native people who are in the way.  It’s subtle with a capital B.

While denying that current foreign policy is the “main point” of Avatar, the director James Cameron told the Times of London that “Americans had a ‘moral responsibility’ to understand the impact that their country’s recent military campaigns had had.  ‘We went down a path that cost several hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives. I don’t think the American people even know why it was done. So it’s all about opening your eyes.'”  He continued: “We know what it feels like to launch the missiles. We don’t know what it feels like for them to land on our home soil, not in America. I think there’s a moral responsibility to understand that.”

Um, I think we know how it feels to have planes fly into skyscrapers.  Does that count?

The problem with Avatar is not that it contains a critique of American foreign policy.  Apocalypse Now did that and was superb.  The problem is that the critique is amazingly heavy-handed and simple-minded.  The military leader is so over-the-top evil that they could have put horns and a tail on him if it wouldn’t make him look too much like the purely innocent native people, with their USB port tails and pointy ears.  The corporate representative was such a toady that he should have hopped like a frog.  These people are not real characters, with authentic emotions, complex ideas, and personal strengths and weaknesses.  They are cartoon characters, which I guess some of them really are — at least of the computer-generated variety.

I haven’t seen it yet, but I’ll bet that Matt is right that Black Dynamite is a better film.


A Colbert State of Mind

December 20, 2009

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Colbert raps with Alicia Keyes. Colbert keeps it real- really suburban.


Cool Charter School Map

December 18, 2009

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Cool charter school map from U.S. News and World Report.


The State of Happiness

December 18, 2009

The news is filled with stories about a new study published today in Science Magazine ranking states by how happy people are.  The study is based on huge national survey that asks “In general, how satisfied are you with your life?  Subjects can answer very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied, creating a 4 point scale.  The researchers controlled for personal factors, such as income, age, marital status, race, and employment status to identify which states had the highest regression-adjusted self-reported happiness.

The study also references earlier research by Gabriel, et al (2003) that develops an objective measure of happiness (or more accurately — quality of life).  They identified a long list of amenities that might be appealing to people, including weather, access to ocean or inland coast, state or national parks, crime, pollution, cost of living, commute times, etc…  They then predicted housing prices based on all of those variables.  This would allow them to know, for example, how much more people would be willing to pay for a house (all else equal) for each sunny day on average per year.  Essentially, these researchers can empirically derive the price for each of the long list of amenities they identified.  The average aggregate price of all of those amenities in each state allows them to develop an objective measure of happiness for each state.

Interestingly, states with higher median household income tend to be less happy.  However, it is important to note that the regression with dummies for each state shows positive coefficients for income, so money does contribute to happiness as long as it is only more money relative to my neighbors and not relative to the national average.

It is also interesting that blue states seem to be especially unhappy.  I calculated that there is a correlation of .48 between the percentage of voters in a state that voted for Bush in 2000 and the state’s happiness rank, using the objective measure.  The objective and subjective measure are also strongly correlated to each other, which is reassuring.

I would also note that Matt and I seem to live in happy states, while poor Greg is in a relatively unhappy state.  And pity Marcus and all of those other New Yorkers, with NY ranking at the bottom in terms of happiness on both measures.

  Obj. Sub.
AL 26  
AK 23 12
AZ 20 6
AR 3 17
CA 42 45
CO 34 2
CT 32 49
DE 30 22
DC N/A 36
FL 10 4
GA 36 19
HI 38 3
ID 5 16
IL 48 44
IN 44 47
IA 15 30
KS 19 31
KY 24 34
LA 8 1
ME 9 10
MD 45 39
MA 27 43
MI 49 48
MN 46 25
MS 7 9
MO 40 37
MT 4 8
NE 16 33
NV 29 38
NH 43 26
NJ 47 46
NM 14 23
NY 50 50
NC 17 13
ND 6 24
OH 33 42
OK 21 21
OR 22 29
PA 35 40
RI 12 41
SC 18 7
SD 2 14
TN 28 5
TX 25 15
UT 39 20
VT 13 18
VA 31 27
WA 41 35
WV 11 32
WI 37 28
WY 1 11

Pass the Popcorn: Black Dynamite

December 18, 2009

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

All of western civilization was merely a dull prelude to BLACK DYNAMITE. Why oh why did we have to wait until 2009 until someone made this film? Aughts, you stand redeemed!

Okay, so I am exaggerating, but only a little.

Mix one part spoof, two parts homage, add generous amounts of kung-fu, crypto-racial conspiracy and revenge fantasy. The result: the best Blaxploitation flick since Truck Turner.

Avatar? Yawn…I prefer films that have a bad plot on purpose. Besides, Black Dynamite would kill James Cameron’s evil space marines with his nunchuk in about 10 minutes. Roll credits! Those 12 foot tall blue Scotty Pippen looking aliens would build a Black Dynamite statue and worship him like Ewoks who found a new protocol droid. Except it would be in 3D this time.

Black Dynamite battles THE MAN and his anti-brother conspiracy, and his fight takes him through drug pushers, the CIA, an evil Chinese super-villian, and all the way to the “Honky House.”  THE MAN is doomed and the ladies swoon. Run, don’t walk to the theatre!


Death Panels for College Kids Update

December 18, 2009

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

In today’s Wall Street Journal, Arne Duncan points out that it makes no sense for government to run a giant subsidy program for student loans that allows bankers to capture taxpayer dollars as intermediaries between Uncle Sam and the kids.

Obviously, the only sensible alternative is for government to completely abolish private lending and socialize the whole system, so that the only place any student of any income level will be able to go for a loan is the federal government! No other possible solution to the problem is imagineable.

The headline summarizes the administration’s bullying ambitions with admirable transparency: “Banks Don’t Belong in the Student Loan Business.”

And how did the path to socialism start? With the creation of a “public option.” After that, the rest is just math.


What’s so funny about peace, Rawls and understanding?

December 17, 2009

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Turns out that I am not the only libertarian with an interest in John Rawls. David Gordon laid out the thinking of a small group of libertarian Rawlsians in this American Conservative article back in 2004.

Greg- talk me off the ledge before I jump!


Pioneer Settlers

December 17, 2009

It was with some pride that I read the article in this morning’s WSJ about the board game, Settlers of Catan, as “the latest interactive fad to hit high-tech circles.”  I say pride because Greg, Marcus, and I were way ahead of our time.  We regularly played Settlers during lunch (or when the internet went down, or whenever else we felt like it) back when we had our research bunker in Florida. 

Despite devoting a fair chunk of time and energy to that and a few other board games, those research bunker days were probably some of my most productive.  I guess these high-tech executives are discovering what we already knew — clever strategy board games help sharpen the mind and teach important skills.  I have no idea why they don’t regularly play these games in schools.  You could learn a lot about economics, the mutual benefits of trade, etc…

What am I saying?  We mostly did it because it was fun.


Marcus: RttT Is No Kabuki

December 16, 2009

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

In the past I’ve suggested, in response to Mike Petrilli’s cheerleading for it, that Race to the Top is just a bunch of kabuki. In today’s Washington Examiner, Marcus begs to differ:

Race to the Top has emboldened reform-minded policymakers like Bloomberg to push hard for their ideas. Just as importantly, the lure of earning federal dollars makes the reform position an appealing default for those policymakers whose primary interest lies outside education.

For instance, before Race to the Top, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger paid only brief lip service to education reform. After the grant competition was announced, the Governator called a special session of the state legislature and pushed for a series of meaningful reforms such as eliminating the state’s charter school cap, using data to evaluate student and teacher performance, and adopting a performance pay program for teachers.

I would argue back, but I’m not sure I can. Just last week I praised Bloomberg’s move to push the envelope on interpreting the state’s ban on evaluating teachers with test scores as “gutsball.” By doing so, have I already conceded Marcus’s (and therefore Mike’s) point?

I suppose I could argue that Bloomberg was a reformer even before RttT came along. Maybe he would have played gutsball on the teacher test score ban even without RttT. But it’s hard to think that RttT has nothing to do with his renewed boldness. After all, using test scores in teacher evaluations is an agenda set by RttT. And, as Marcus points out, Bloomberg staged the announcement of his gutsball move in D.C., not New York. Was Bloomberg pushing for this particular reform before? And could he have won on that issue if not for RttT’s covering fire?

I suppose I could argue that the use of test scores as “one element” in teacher evaluations will inevitably be nothing more than a symbolic victory. Trouble is, I’ve always argued that symbols matter. There’s no such thing as a merely symbolic victory.

I suppose I could argue that RttT is promoting bad ideas as well as good ones. And that would be true – but it wouldn’t establish that RttT is kabuki. Quite the opposite; the more we fear RttT for promoting bad ideas, the more we confirm that whatever it is, it isn’t kabuki.

It’s beginning to feel like I may owe Mike an apology. Stay tuned.