Two New Studies on How School Choice Impacts Students in Vulnerable Demographic Categories

Race Card w watermark

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

At Brookings, Matthew Chingos looks at a huge swath of CCD data and finds no evidence that charter schools increase racial segregation. No surprise there, as readers of Win-Win already know. It’s been a while since I had occasion to trot out the old race card graphic – my sense is that the segregation talking point has had its day in the sun.

In Education Finance and Policy, Rajashri Chakrabarti looks at Florida school data and contributes the latest in a line of studies showing that schools act in self-interested ways, responding to structural incentives, when classifying students into special programs. Chakrabarti finds that schools threatened with vouchers due to low test scores increased the classification of students as Limited English Proficient, removing them from the pool of tested students; however, schools did not increase classification of students into special education, where they would become eligible for McKay vouchers. The obvious conclusion? All students should be eligible for vouchers – then there’s no system to game.

PS Sorry for the awkward headline – I couldn’t come up with anything snappier or any pop culture references. Uh . . . release the kraken!

2 Responses to Two New Studies on How School Choice Impacts Students in Vulnerable Demographic Categories

  1. George Mitchell says:

    Greg,

    Now that you mention the headline, note

    http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/is-impact-a-verb.aspx

    🙂

  2. […] guest-blogger Greg Forster points out about this “self-interested” approach, the schools were shown to have reclassified students as “Limited English Proficient” […]

Leave a comment