Get Lost (If You Don’t Want to See Me Gloat)

“They teach you to predict the weather at a box company?”

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

Sorry I’m so late to the party. I just saw the finale last night.

First let me gloat that I made (I believe) only one specific, concrete prediction, and after over a year of appearing to be falsified it was at long last fulfilled in the finale. The Axiom conquers all.

(OK, OK, it was only sort of fulfilled. But we all know that “moving on” for Daniel is going to include killing bad guys and winning Charlotte. Right?)

More generally, I feel vindicated in having maintained for so long that the real key to the whole show is the question of whether Locke was right to put his faith in the fundamental goodness of “the island.” I didn’t really get it all articulated at the time, but that was the reason I was struggling near the end to figure out, in retrospect, how Smokey fit in with Locke’s story over the course of the show. I wanted to know why they had chosen to incarnate Smokey in Locke’s body. Why remove Locke from the show when he was the lynchpin holding it all together? Now I see – they did it to set up the confrontation in the end between the spiritual Locke (Jack) and the physical Locke (Smokey). Jack had to finally admit, to himself and everybody else, that Smokey wasn’t Locke because he (Jack) was Locke.

On one level, I got what I wanted out of the finale. What I wanted was 1) a knock-down, drag-out knife fight for the fate of the world on the edge of a slowly crumbling cliff, and 2) a noble death. Check and check. I’m a happy guy.

But I think the ending is satisfying on a deeper level, too. I don’t need to know anything more than I now know about Dharma, Widmore, childbirth, chosen ones, etc. (It still bugs me that Walt appeared to Locke, but I can deal.) Those were all just skins the show shed, one after the other. On a show like this, it’s foolish to expect too much from the skins. What you have to do is follow the snake. Or maybe a better image is the old cups and balls routine – the ball moves from cup to cup, but it’s the ball you need to keep your eye on.

Jay is right that the soap opera stuff can’t hold up the show by itself. You need a larger drama to give the soap opera stuff meaning. Well, the larger drama was whether the island was good or bad, and on that it delivered just fine.

I’m not saying it’s the ending I would have written myself. I happen to think that “rejoining your loved ones” and learning to “move on” from the past, simply by themselves, is a contemptible vision of heaven. Even if that’s just the prelude to whatever “comes next,” what makes the afterlife attractive on this vision is having a chance to start again – a do-over. But what makes you think you won’t just screw it all up again – especially given infinite time – and just end up in the same place? Jacob committed the same folly – he kept bringing people to the island to show Smokey that people are basically good, and the people disappointed him every single time. You aspire to an eternity of endless do-overs? That’s the Buddhist conception of hell. I happen to believe that there’s a hell even worse than that, but the Buddhists are right when they say that if the afterlife is just more of the same forever, with periodic opportunities to start over with a fresh slate, then existence is suffering and annihilation is heaven. (It’s ironic that the show had the symbols of all the world religions in the church window. The world religions don’t really all teach the same thing, but there are some things they do all agree on, and the repudiation of this show’s vision of heaven is one of them. They all, in radically different ways, claim to offer an escape from the hell that is our own broken nature.)

But none of that detracts from my enjoyment of the show, because I don’t watch shows to have my own worldview affirmed. The enjoyment of narrative lies precisely in having the opportunity to explore a universe other than the one we really live in. Achilles is a horrible monster committing barbarism motivated by egocentrism in the service of unjust aggressors, but that doesn’t detract from my enjoyment of the Illiad. (I have gotten much help on this subject from C.S. Lewis’s An Experiment in Criticism.)

And if you don’t like my analysis, here’s my wife’s, which I think may find some agreement. “I figured out the secret ending,” she said to me this morning. “It’s the subliminal messages they put in the finale that say BUY ALL THE EPISODES ON DVD AND YOU CAN FIGURE IT ALL OUT.” She suggests that they put in references to all the world’s religions “not so that they’ll be equally happy but so that they’ll all be equally frustrated.”

12 Responses to Get Lost (If You Don’t Want to See Me Gloat)

  1. jay p greene says:

    Amen, brother Greg. Did you notice that one of the stain glass windows had a symbol of the wooden wheel?

  2. Greg Forster says:

    Yes, indeed. People who think this way are totally immune to irony.

  3. Patrick says:

    PS, I think I was right about Smokey. He just wanted to leave the island. I wasn’t convinced he was true evil. After all, Jacob killed people and both guys were deceitful.

  4. Greg Forster says:

    I’ve been around that merry-go-round several times with Jay already, I believe. The fact that they did similar things doesn’t make them morally equivalent. As WFB once said about Cold-War-era moral equivalency, it’s like saying the guy who pushes a little old lady out of the path of a runaway bus is really just the same as the guy who pushes a little old lady into the path of a runaway bus – because, after all, they both push little old ladies around.

  5. Patrick says:

    They did nothing beyond using light and dark imagery, which is cliché at best, to convince us that Smokey was truly evil…

  6. Greg Forster says:

    Well, that plus the fact that he murdered a whole bunch of people for his own selfish ends, starting with the copilot in the first episode and ending with Jack in the final episode.

    Whereas Jacob killed people in order to save the world, which is kind of, you know, not on the same level (to say the very least) as murdering people for frankly selfish ends.

  7. Patrick says:

    but we don’t actually know he was saving the world. Claiming you are saving the world and saving the world are two different things. They didn’t explain much beyond “have faith in my cryptic message” and without empirical evidence I simply cannot believe more than that. 🙂

    Clearly he was intended to be the villain, but I think that was just poor creativity on the part of the writers.

    And wasn’t it the copilot (who later played on the TV show Heroes…which was terrible…in the second episode? I could be wrong.

  8. Brian Kisida says:

    Glad you finally got to it Greg. Nice review.

  9. Greg Forster says:


    First consider what happened 1) when Dharma drilled into the electromagnetic hotspot and 2) when John stopped Desmond from pushing the button that one time. What might happen if the whole island sunk?

    Then consider that the island is naturally linked to a worldwide network of EM hotspots. Preventing-the-end-of-the-worldwise, I’d say letting the island sink would be baaaaaaad idea.

  10. Patrick says:

    If the island sunk it would be wet.

  11. Greg Forster says:

    That’s quite a risk you’re willing to take with the fate of the world.

    Everybody make a note – after the revolution, when JPGB readers rule the world, don’t put Patrick in charge of nuclear power regulation. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: