The Larger Case Against Socialism

April 21, 2009

billy-bragg-talking-with-the-taxman

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

Readers of JPGB who have followed our occasional coverage of the resurgence of socialism in America may be interested in this column of mine that just went up on The Public Discourse. It addresses Charles Murray’s lecture last month that makes what might be called the “larger” case against socialism – beyond its economic and demographic unsustainability, socialism also undermines all the social structures that provide higher meaning in human life, and would thus be undesirable even if it were sustainable. The lecture got a lot of attention among conservatives. I argue that Murray’s analysis is correct and very valuable as far as it goes, but that it’s missing a crucial element that’s needed to make the case complete.


Questions for Leo: Do you smell what the Blob is cooking?

April 21, 2009

therock

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

In today’s installment of our ongoing series Questions for Leo, we feature this 1997 photo of Leo Casey subtly indicating to the members of the New York City Council education committee that it’s time for them to pick up their cue cards and start asking the prearranged questions.

Since his appearance before the committee was more phony than a pro wrestling match, today’s question for Leo is: Do you smell what the Blob is cooking?

Below, the latest embarrassing expose on the UFT – yet another hilariously misspelled cue card.

barack-is-cooking

Edited to correct a misspelling – I put an “e” in “subtly.” Yes, I have submitted my job application to the UFT and expect to hear back shortly.


Juan Williams Tells It Like It Is

April 21, 2009

Juan Williams has a new piece on D.C. vouchers and it is clear that he isn’t holding anything back:

“As I watch Washington politics I am not easily given to rage. Washington politics is a game and selfishness, out-sized egos and corruption are predictable. But over the last week I find myself in a fury. The cause of my upset is watching the key civil rights issue of this generation — improving big city public school education — get tossed overboard by political gamesmanship…”

Williams notes that Obama and Duncan pledged themselves to following the evidence on vouchers:

“all along the administration indicated that pending evidence that this voucher program or any other produces better test scores for students they were willing to fight for it. The president has said that when it comes to better schools he is open to supporting ‘what works for kids.’ That looked like a level playing field on which to evaluate the program and even possibly expanding the program.”

And the evidence has come in, he notes:

“What happened, according to a Department of Education study, is that after three years the voucher students scored 3.7 months higher on reading than students who remained in the D.C. schools. In addition, students who came into the D.C. voucher program when it first started had a 19 month advantage in reading after three years in private schools.”

But Williams accuses Obama and Duncan of violating their earlier pledge and disregarding the evidence.  Instead, in a “politically calculated dance step” and implementing “a sly, political check-mate” Obama and Duncan have taken steps to kill the D.C. program.

Juan Williams then identifies the culprit in this story:

“The political pressure will be coming exclusively from the teacher’s unions who oppose the vouchers, just as they oppose No Child Left Behind and charter schools and every other effort at reforming public schools that continue to fail the nation’s most vulnerable young people, low income blacks and Hispanics. The National Education Association and other teachers’ unions have put millions into Democrats’ congressional campaigns because they oppose Republican efforts to challenge unions on their resistance to school reform and specifically their refusal to support ideas such as performance-based pay for teachers who raise students’ test scores. By going along with Secretary Duncan’s plan to hollow out the D.C. voucher program this president, who has spoken so passionately about the importance of education, is playing rank politics with the education of poor children. It is an outrage.”

What do you really think, Juan?

“This reckless dismantling of the D.C. voucher program does not bode well for arguments to come about standards in the effort to reauthorize No Child Left Behind. It does not speak well of the promise of President Obama to be the ‘Education President,’ who once seemed primed to stand up for all children who want to learn and especially minority children.

And its time for all of us to get outraged about this sin against our children.”


Questions for Leo: S’alright?

April 20, 2009

Our ongoing series “Questions for Leo” features this video of Leo and a NY City Council Member discussing whether “s’alright.”  Si.  S’alright.


Heritage and WaPo Bring the Pain

April 20, 2009

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Lindsey Burke of the Heritage Foundation published the results of the latest survey of where members of Congress sent/send their own children to school. The survey finds:

 • 44 percent of Senators and 36 percent of Representatives had ever sent their children to private schools. Among the general public, only 11 percent of American students attend private school.

• While members of the 111th Congress practice school choice for their own families, they should also support school choice policies for all of America’s families. A failed amendment offered by Senator John Ensign (R–NV) on behalf of the popular and successful D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program would have passed if Members of Congress who exercised school choice for theirown children had voted in favor of the amendment. The future of the D.C. voucher program is now uncertain.Approximately 20 percent of Members of the 111th Congress attended private high school themselves—nearly twice the rate of the American public.

The Washington Post editorialized on the study this morning:

The gap between what Congress practices and what it preaches was best illustrated by the Heritage Foundation’s analysis of a recent vote to preserve the program. The measure was defeated by the Senate 58 to 39; it would have passed if senators who exercised school choice for their own children had voted in favor. Alas, the survey doesn’t name names, save for singling out Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), architect of the language that threatens the program, for sending his children to private school and attending private school himself…

Mr. Duncan, in a recent interview, spoke eloquently of his family’s choice of Arlington as a place to live because of what he called the “determining factor” of schools. He told Science magazine: “My family has given up so much so that I could have the opportunity to serve; I didn’t want to try to save the country’s children and our educational system and jeopardize my own children’s education.” We don’t think it’s too much to expect our leaders to treat their constituents with the same fairness and regard they demand for their own families.

Next year, I’d love to see Heritage go in to even greater depth. Let’s see how many Congressmen sent their children to Anacostia High, etc. Let’s put the over/under at one.

I’ll take the under.


Famous Steakholders, Volume Three

April 20, 2009

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

Obviously this is what UFT was thinking of!

red-homer-contest-begins

homer-steak

red-homer

“I don’t understand!”

homer-steak-eating-better-thumbnail

“There’s food in front of me, but I don’t want to eat it!”


Happy Anniversary

April 19, 2009

It has now been one year since we started Jay P. Greene’s Blog: With Help From Some Friends.  With no more than an investment of $15 for domain registration and some time from Matt, Greg, and me, I think we’ve done pretty well over the last year.

We’ve written 507 posts and received 2,184 comments.  The site has been viewed a total of 121,567 times (and that doesn’t include us obsessively checking for new comments).  Readership started out slow but is now around 13,000 per month. 

According to Technorati, JPGB is one of the more influential blogs devoted to education policy.  JPGB has an authority rating of 100, which is a measure of the number of other blogs linking to our site in the last 90 days.  The more blogs that link to a site the more “authority” it is said to have.  As you can see in the list below, JPGB has a  Technorati authority rating that trails Joanne Jacobs and Eduwonk, but leads most other education policy blogs.

  1. Joanne Jacobs     194
  2. Eduwonk      148
  3. Jay P. Greene     100
  4. Bridging Differences     98
  5. Flypaper     97
  6. Core Knowledge     95
  7. The Quick and the Ed     93
  8. Ed Week’s Politics K-12    89
  9. This Week in Education     85
  10. Edwize     74 (most recent available)
  11. Matthew K. Tabor     65
  12. D-Ed Reckoning     51
  13. Edspresso     50
  14. Sherman Dorn     49
  15. CF Policyblog     31
  16. Ed Week’s NCLB Act II     31
  17. Education Intelligence Agency     22
  18. Swift and Change Able     20
  19. Ed is Watching   14
  20. Reason — Out of Control     13

But our goal has never been to maximize readership.  Mostly, we just wanted a platform to express our views directly to others who wanted to see those views.  With more than 500 posts, more than 2,000 comments, and hundreds of links from other sites, we ‘ve clearly succeeded.

A close second goal for the blog has been to have an outlet for amusing ourselves and each other.  At that we have also clearly succeeded.  I’ve had a great time working with Greg and Matt.  Thanks for a great year!


Get Lost Daddy Issues

April 19, 2009

Lost Images - Lost Season Two - A Tale of Two Cities

Last week I suggested the theory that the Island in Lost is actually an evil supernatural force and that the walking dead (Locke, Christian, etc…) are not themselves but actually representations of that evil force.  This week’s episode, “Some like it Hoth” provides further evidence of that theory. 

Hoth is a reference to the ice planet in Empire Strikes Back.  As Hurley tells us, the unresolved conflict between Luke and his father, Darth Vader, leads to all sorts of problems as well as a lame Return of the Jedipopulated with ewoks.  If only they had worked out those “daddy issues” much suffering could have been avoided. 

Similarly, Lost is filled with unresolved daddy issues.  Just about every parent/child relationship that has been introduced is a troubled one: Jack and Christian; Kate and her dad; Locke and his dad, Ben and his dad; Sun and her dad; Penny and Charles; and now Miles and his dad.  Hurley is the exception.  He’s worked things out with his dad and in doing so has changed the negative fate of unresolved daddy issues, just as he urges Miles to do and just as he does in his rewriting of Empire Strikes Back.

 

The further evidence that the Island is evil is that it appears to demand or favor those who have failed to resolve conflicts with their fathers or have even killed their fathers.  Richard told Locke that he would have to kill his father because the Island demanded a sacrifice.  Until now I thought he was misrepresenting the will of the Island.  But now I can see that Richard is a faithful servant of the Island’s will.  And we’ve seen that Ben (who killed his father) was spared by the Island as long as he follows Locke (who is probably just Smokey and who himself arranged to have his father killed). 

It’s an inversion of the binding of Isaac.  Rather than sparing the son, the evil Island demands the sacrifice of the father.

Other bits of evidence to support my theory — When Charlotte says this island is death, she really means it.  And that was the title of that episode.  I think the titles are telling us the truth.  And what was Eko doing when Smokey killed him?  Building a church.


The Hits Keep on Coming, Extended Dance Remix

April 18, 2009

 

As hard as Obama, Duncan, and Durbin try to minimize media attention to their efforts to kill D.C. vouchers with language slipped into an omnibus spending bill and Friday afternoon sneaky political tricks, the story just won’t go away. 

Since our latest summary of greatest hits, I have an op-ed in the WSJ.  Greg has a new piece in Pajamas Media.  Shikha Dalmia has a piece in Forbes.  Glenn Beck has devoted a segment of his Fox TV show to the issue.  Senator Ensign gave a speech describing his fight for D.C. vouchers and vowing to expand federal voucher programs to include special education nationwide.  Senator Lieberman will begin holding hearings on the re-authorization of D.C. vouchers next month.

If D.C. vouchers go down, they won’t go down quietly.  Politicians who break their word to abide by the evidence,  who would deny to others the choices and opportunities they enjoy, and who try to get away with sneaky Friday afternoon political tricks will have to account for their actions. 

Greg put it best in his PM piece:

“Vouchers may lose in D.C., but that doesn’t mean they’re not winning in the long term. Every successful movement loses some battles. Indeed, the more important the cause, the more we should expect the entrenched interests of the status quo to invest in fighting it off. That will inevitably mean some setbacks alongside the victories.

Where would we be today if Martin Luther King’s letter from the Birmingham jail had just said, ‘Well, here I am in jail — I guess I’ve lost the fight’? King knew he wasn’t in jail because he was losing. He was in jail because he was winning.

And the cowards who put him in jail knew it just as well as he did.”


Get Well Arne

April 18, 2009

Someone should send Arne Duncan a get well card.  A Friday afternoon passed without another sneaky political trick to kill the D.C. voucher program.  Maybe he was sick and just couldn’t muster the energy. 

Or maybe his conscience is getting to him and he could no longer betray his commitment to “do what works for kids” regardless of predisposition or ideology.  Maybe he was sick before and is now getting better.

Whatever the case may be, let us wish for the physical and policy health of the Secretary so that he does what is right by D.C. vouchers with good body and spirit.