UCLA Civil Rights Project Gets It Wrong

My friends over at Mid-Riffs take apart the new report from Gary Orfield’s UCLA Civil Rights Project claiming that charters produce segregation:

“The report finds:

that charter schools, particularly those in the western United States are havens for white re-segregation from public schools; requirements for providing essential equity data to the federal government go unmet across the nation; and magnet schools are overlooked, in spite of showing greater levels of integration and academic achievement than charters.

It looks like, based on a quick pass through the report, their main finding is based on demographic comparisons  between charter schools and traditional public schools at the state level. This method of comparison likely leads to inaccurate conclusions due to the fact that charter schools are overwhelmingly an urban phenomenon. The correct comparison is between charters and the demographics of their immediate geographic area. We have discussed this topic as it relates to Little Rock at length here.

The Economist’s take on this report is concise, to-the-point, and spot on.

In plain English, there are a lot of black kids in charter schools. This is because charter schools tend to get set up in neighbourhoods where the public schools are terrible, such as south-eastern Washington DC or the rougher parts of New Orleans. These neighbourhoods are disproportionately African-American. Charter schools are popular with poor black parents because their other choices are so awful. There are very few charter schools in rich white suburbs with nice public schools, because there is no call for them.

The important question about charter schools is: do they give kids a better education than they would otherwise have received? The answer is yes. Nothing else matters.”

6 Responses to UCLA Civil Rights Project Gets It Wrong

  1. Greg Forster says:

    Much more analysis of this issue here.

  2. Jason says:

    Separate but equal?

  3. Greg Forster says:

    Given that school choice reduces segregation and narrows the achievement gap at the same time, I’d say the answer to your question is “no.”

  4. allen says:

    Har! On the basis of parental preference I’d say the appropriate catchphrase is “separate but superior”.

  5. concerned says:

    Inacurrately applying data… Imagine that!

    On civil rights and the responsibility of School Board Members to act as public servants, check out:

    http://seattlemathgroup.blogspot.com/2010/02/looking-at-decision.html

  6. […] this month, Jay P. Greene argued that the Civil Rights Project got it wrong. (In the next few days, I’m going to have a post digesting the UCLA study and seeing what we […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s