(Guest post by Greg Forster)
If you subscribe to National Review, don’t miss Kevin Williamson’s fantastic piece in the new issue on home schooling. Here are three little tastes of a long article in which every paragraph is good:
In the public imagination, homeschooling has a distinctly conservative and Evangelical odor about it, but it was not always so. The modern homeschooling movement really has its roots in 1960s countercultural tendencies; along with A Love Supreme, it may represent the only worthwhile cultural product of that era. The movement’s urtext is Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing, by A. S. Neill, which sold millions of copies in the 1960s and 1970s…
[Dana Goldstein, writing against home schooling in Slate] went on to argue that the children of high-achieving parents amount to public goods because of peer effects…She does not extend that analysis to its logical conclusion: that conscientious, educated liberals should enroll their children in the very worst public schools they can find in order to maximize the public good…
Teachers’ unions have money on the line, and ideologues do not want any young skull beyond their curricular reach. A political class that does not trust people with a Big Gulp is not going to trust them with the minds of children.
If you don’t subscribe – shame on you!
I’ll definitely check out the article. At any rate I’m very glad to see you are still active in this debate. I still remember when I first saw the “Stupid in America” 20/20 special that you were featured in and was blown away by the fact that we have continued to increase spending on education with no results to show for it.
Keep up the hard hitting analysis!
I think that’s Jay you’re thinking of. But it’s always an honor to be mistaken for Jay Greene!
[…] Kevin Williamson on Homeschooling (jaypgreene.com) […]