Governor Daniels vs. Bloat

August 31, 2010

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

From the Indy Star:

Daniels cited a national study released a few weeks ago by the Goldwater Institute in Arizona. It found the number of full-time administrators for every 100 students at 189 top U.S. universities had increased by 39 percent from 1993 to 2007.

The study blamed the administrative bloat on subsidies from federal and state governments and suggested that reducing subsidies would force schools to operate more efficiently.

“The role of trustee has never been so critical as it is today,” Daniels said. “But I don’t want to see you at the Statehouse asking for more money.

“Please stay back at the school and find ways to be more efficient with those dollars.”


Sneak Preview: Report Card on American Education

August 30, 2010

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Later this week the American Legislative Exchange Council will release Report Card on American Education: Ranking State K-12 Performance, Progress and Reform written by yours truly, Dan Lips and Andy LeFevre.

As suggested by the title, we grade each state by their academic performance, their academic gains and their K-12 reform policies. On the later, we use a “poll of polls” technique and average the grades assigned for particular policy areas on academic standards, teacher quality, charter school laws, private choice, digital education etc.

Sneak peak: a B+ was the highest grade.

On the performance and progress, we utilize NAEP with an eye to maximizing comparability  between states. After all, no one can be shocked that Connecticut has higher NAEP scores than Mississippi, given the huge disparities in income between the two states.

We therefore judge each state based on the scores of free and reduced lunch eligible general education students on all four main NAEP exams: 4th grade reading and math, 8th grade reading and math. We use the period for which all 50 states and the District of Columbia have participated in NAEP (2003-2009). Using free or reduced lunch eligibility keeps the income range of students under a known limit, whereas non-free and reduced lunch kids can vary in income from still relatively hardscrabble to billionaires.

We made no effort to control for race or ethnicity despite the well-known existence of racial achievement gaps. This is because we believe that such gaps can in fact be closed. We believe that the gaps exist due to policy and cultural factors, all of which can be changed. Schools in particular are in the business (or should be) of promoting a strong academic culture focused on learning-aka controlling the culture of the school.

You’ve never heard of a racial combat effectiveness gap in the United States Marines Corps because it doesn’t exist. The fact that the Marines are a well-led organization with a strong culture has a great deal to do with that, as does the fact that every Marine is a part of the Corps by choice.

In any case, we do not claim that our NAEP rankings provide perfect comparability  just enormously better comparability  than looking at raw NAEP scores.

So you are dying to know whether your state rocked or sucked wind in the rankings. Calm down- pace yourself!

All will be revealed later in the week.


The Future vs. Bloat

August 25, 2010

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Brian Caulfield asks the question at Forbes: should Apple kill the university as we know it? Cites Jay, Brian and Jonathan’s bloat study.

Answer: yes. If they don’t, someone else will.


Even More Bloat!

August 23, 2010

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Yours truly weighs in on the bloat fest!


Why Teachers Are Being Laid Off

August 23, 2010

In this photo taken on Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2010, ...

If you want to know why teachers are being laid off in California (even if teaching has remained one of the most secure jobs nationwide) you might want to check out this new $578 million high school in LA Unified School District.  As we’ve written before on JPGB, buildings don’t teach kids, people do.  Given the way school districts squander their resources, maybe they’ll soon need another $26 billion in Edujobs from Congress (read: taxpayers).

[CORRECTION — Oops.  This is actually a photo of a different (and much less costly) high school in LA, the Visual and Performing Arts High School.  I can only imagine that the new $578 million high school is plated in gold.]

Thanks to Stuart for finding a photo of the $578 million high school.  It doesn’t look plated in gold so I guess the gold is on the inside:


Go see Waiting for Superman!

August 20, 2010

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

I had a chance to see a screening of Waiting for Superman yesterday hosted by Expect More Arizona. It was extremely well done, and very moving. When it is released in the theatres in September, I plan to march everyone I can drag to the theatre.


Administrative Bloat — Updated Coverage

August 18, 2010

Here’s the updated list of coverage of the report on administrative bloat in American universities that I wrote with Brian Kisida and Jonathan Mills for the Goldwater Institute:

Op-eds

Atlanta Journal Constitution

Austin American Statesman

Baltimore Sun

Indianapolis Star

AOLNews

News

Dallas Morning News

Indianapolis Star

USA Today

Chronicle of Higher Education

Arizona Republic

Arizona Daily Star

Sunshine News

Phoenix Business Journal

AZ Daily Sun

Arizona Capitol Times

Inside Higher Ed

Modesto Bee

Time

Kiplinger’s

Fort Wayne Journal Gazette

Baylor Lariat

Columnists / Editorials

The Economist

Forbes

Arizona Republic

Dallas Morning News

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Denver Post

Dallas Morning News

Selected Blogs

Instavision

National Association of Scholars

Instapundit

Cato@Liberty

Phi Beta Cons

Reason Foundation — Nick Gillespie

Reason Foundation — Lisa Snell

George W. Bush Institute

Pelican Institute

MacIver Institute

Nevada Policy Research Institute

The Five Year Party

Carolina Journal

American Council of Trustees and Alumni

The Volokh Conspiracy

Minding the Campus

And here is our rebuttal to ASU’s statement attacking the report.  The rebuttal works for most of the issues raised by other universities as well:

Our Rebuttal


Administrative Bloat is Here

August 17, 2010

Here’s the updated list of coverage of the report on administrative bloat in American universities that I wrote with Brian Kisida and Jonathan Mills for the Goldwater Institute:

Op-eds

Atlanta Journal Constitution

Austin American Statesman

Baltimore Sun

Indianapolis Star

AOLNews

News

Dallas Morning News

Indianapolis Star

USA Today

Chronicle of Higher Education

Arizona Republic

Arizona Daily Star

Sunshine News

Phoenix Business Journal

AZ Daily Sun

Arizona Capitol Times

Inside Higher Ed

Modesto Bee

Time

Kiplinger’s

Fort Wayne Journal Gazette

Baylor Lariat

Columnists / Editorials

The Economist

Forbes

Arizona Republic

Dallas Morning News

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Denver Post

Dallas Morning News

Selected Blogs

Instavision

National Association of Scholars

Instapundit

Cato@Liberty

Phi Beta Cons

Reason Foundation — Nick Gillespie

Reason Foundation — Lisa Snell

George W. Bush Institute

Pelican Institute

MacIver Institute

Nevada Policy Research Institute

The Five Year Party

Carolina Journal

American Council of Trustees and Alumni

The Volokh Conspiracy

Minding the Campus

And here is our rebuttal to ASU’s statement attacking the report.  The rebuttal works for most of the issues raised by other universities as well:

Our Rebuttal

[UPDATE — This page has been revised to mirror the updated coverage post, which is here .]


Administrative Bloat Report — Release Tomorrow

August 16, 2010

With Brian Kisida and Jonathan Mills, I have a report on administrative bloat at American universities being released by the Goldwater Institute tomorrow.  You should be able to find it at the Goldwater web site.

If you thought K-12 education was suffering under a large and growing bureaucracy, just wait until you see the results in tomorrow’s report.  In your heart you know it’s right.


Nowhere to Hide

August 16, 2010

The LA Times used Freedom of Information requests to obtain student achievement data linked to teachers in LA unified.  The students’ names were removed, but not the teachers. The paper then hired researchers at RAND to analyze the data and calculate the value-added of individual teachers.  And then the paper published all of the results.  WOW!

It’s no longer possible to hide the fact that there are some awful teachers who continue receiving paychecks and depriving kids of an education.  School officials have had these data for years and never used them, never tried to identify who were the best and worst teachers, and never tried to remove bad teachers from the profession.  It took a newspaper and a big FOI request.

Now the school district will be forced to do something about those chronically ineffective teachers.  No one is suggesting that analyses of these test scores should be the sole criteria for identifying or removing ineffective teachers.  But it is a start.

This is going to spread.  As long as the data exist, there will be more and more pressure for school systems to actually use the information and develop systems for identifying and removing teachers who can’t teach.

It’s also worth emphasizing that this new reality is a huge accomplishment of No Child Left Behind.  The accountability and choice provisions of NCLB could never work because school systems could never be asked to sanction themselves.  But the one big thing that NCLB accomplished is getting every public school to measure student achievement in grades 3-8 and report results.  NCLB made it so that these data exist so that the LA Times could FOI the results and push schools to act upon it.  NCLB could never get schools to take real action, but the existence of the data could get others to force schools to act.

And what is the reaction of the teachers unions to all of this?  They’ve called for a boycott of the LA Times. As usual, we see how much more they care about protecting incompetent teachers than protecting kids suffering from educational malpractice.