Opinion Journal Talks About Head Start

Check out this interview that Jason Riley of the Wall Street Journal did with me regarding my blog post on the delay and manipulation of Head Start research by the Obama Administration.

I still haven’t figured out how to embed from WSJ, but here is a screenshot:

 

 

 

About these ads

5 Responses to Opinion Journal Talks About Head Start

  1. George Mitchell says:

    It would be interesting to know if Jay and his colleagues can cite instances where quality research actually has influenced K-12 education policy. This interview suggests that our elected officials are impervious to research, so perhaps such examples are rare.

    Public opinion would, I suspect, rank Head Start as a winner. Similarly, it is a given for most reporters and the public that “small class size” is a winner.

  2. Matthew Ladner says:

    George-

    I would say that high quality research is having a tremendous impact on tenure reform.

    • George Mitchell says:

      from today’s press

      Jindal tenure bill OKd in post-midnight session

      BYLINE: By KEVIN McGILL, Associated Press

      SECTION: STATE AND REGIONAL

      LENGTH: 962 words

      DATELINE: BATON ROUGE La.

      In a rare post-midnight session, the state House early Friday approved Gov. Bobby Jindal’s proposal tying public school teacher job security to student performance. The measure also eliminates seniority protections for teachers when hard financial times force layoffs.

  3. Greg Forster says:

    The influence of research is selective, but where it has influence it matters a lot. In some cases powerful interests align to exclude the research. But in other cases the research makes a big difference. The impact does tend to have a time delay compared with the impact of mere raw power, but over time it does matter.

    I think the research we’ve done on school choice over the past 15 years was a big part of the shift toward choice on the left over the past five years. It wasn’t a sufficient condition to create that shift but I think it was a necessary condition – the progressives wouldn’t have signed on for choice if we hadn’t been able to show them those findings. And the shift on the left is the reason we got The Year of School Choice in 2011.

    See here for deep thoughts.

    • George Mitchell says:

      Greg and Matt,

      Good examples. Greg makes a good point that perhaps the “impact” will be gradual and cumulative.

      Today’s Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has an editorial categorically stating that research shows that smaller class sizes produce learning gains. I have not looked at recent studies in this area; I recall nothing of the quality associated with school choice research, where the results so often are reported as “mixed.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,579 other followers