<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Chicago &#8212; Phony Merit Pay is Dead, Long Live True Merit Pay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/</link>
	<description>With Help From Some Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed is Watching &#187; Finding Winners, Losers, and (Weekend!) Bright Spots in Chicago Teachers Strike</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/#comment-35266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed is Watching &#187; Finding Winners, Losers, and (Weekend!) Bright Spots in Chicago Teachers Strike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=10659#comment-35266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I&#8217;ll leave it to my discerning readers to make what you will of Hess&#8217;s assessment, though someone else probably could mention the impacts on students and parents, too. Anyone looking for some unexpected bright spots might want to mull Jay Greene&#8217;s insights on the demise of phony merit pay in Chicago. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll leave it to my discerning readers to make what you will of Hess&#8217;s assessment, though someone else probably could mention the impacts on students and parents, too. Anyone looking for some unexpected bright spots might want to mull Jay Greene&#8217;s insights on the demise of phony merit pay in Chicago. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago Teacher's Strike Settlement A Victory For Actual Merit Pay, Researcher Argues &#124; StateImpact Florida</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/#comment-35226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chicago Teacher's Strike Settlement A Victory For Actual Merit Pay, Researcher Argues &#124; StateImpact Florida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=10659#comment-35226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Education researcher Jay P. Greene argues the agreement between the school system and the Chicago Teacher’s Union is a victory for true merit pay over “phony merit pay.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Education researcher Jay P. Greene argues the agreement between the school system and the Chicago Teacher’s Union is a victory for true merit pay over “phony merit pay.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay P. Greene</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/#comment-35198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay P. Greene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=10659#comment-35198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If principals can&#039;t be trusted to make hiring decisions then who will make those decisions?  And in what industry do supervisors not hire employees?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If principals can&#8217;t be trusted to make hiring decisions then who will make those decisions?  And in what industry do supervisors not hire employees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leona Weiss</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/#comment-35194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leona Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=10659#comment-35194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with &quot;true&quot; merit pay for teachers remains the accurate assessing of excellence.  We have heard all the arguments against using standardized tests to fairly assess teachers.  Experienced teachers know that students/classes can wildly differ from year to year.  Moreover, we rarely hear of cronyism, politics, or administrative ineptitude that may unfairly target teachers who speak out or do not have friends in the right places. 

In my school, the administration&#039;s desire to implement merit pay is not only an attempt to repress salary expenses and to weed out incompetent or &quot;stale&quot; teachers, but also to pit teachers against one another.  Who will share lessons, teaching ideas, assessments if the other guy might get the credit?  I created most of the lessons, exercises, and exams for our 10th grade course that the other teachers use, yet admin has no idea that the other teachers depend on my work.  If I were to say so, it would make me look small, and administration would not much care as my colleagues are popular teachers.  I believe that teachers ought to work together to create the best classes and the highest standards.  Yet merit pay stifles cooperation and rewards self-promotion and potentially sycophancy.

Perhaps all other professionals and workers contend with the same workplace pressures and dynamics, but many are paid significantly more to do so.  My husband works for a Fortune 500 Company and might lose his job at any moment if he under performs, but his corporate management provides support and feedback that most schools do not--full-time managers who oversee 5 or 6 reports, administrative assistants, extensive yearly reviews, etc.  

Tenure (which ought only to be awarded after fair and rigorous process) allows a teacher to concentrate on her class, voice her opinions without fear of reprisal, and to collaborate with other teachers.  We seem to have forgotten that a major reason for tenure was to protect teachers from possible misuses of administrative power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with &#8220;true&#8221; merit pay for teachers remains the accurate assessing of excellence.  We have heard all the arguments against using standardized tests to fairly assess teachers.  Experienced teachers know that students/classes can wildly differ from year to year.  Moreover, we rarely hear of cronyism, politics, or administrative ineptitude that may unfairly target teachers who speak out or do not have friends in the right places. </p>
<p>In my school, the administration&#8217;s desire to implement merit pay is not only an attempt to repress salary expenses and to weed out incompetent or &#8220;stale&#8221; teachers, but also to pit teachers against one another.  Who will share lessons, teaching ideas, assessments if the other guy might get the credit?  I created most of the lessons, exercises, and exams for our 10th grade course that the other teachers use, yet admin has no idea that the other teachers depend on my work.  If I were to say so, it would make me look small, and administration would not much care as my colleagues are popular teachers.  I believe that teachers ought to work together to create the best classes and the highest standards.  Yet merit pay stifles cooperation and rewards self-promotion and potentially sycophancy.</p>
<p>Perhaps all other professionals and workers contend with the same workplace pressures and dynamics, but many are paid significantly more to do so.  My husband works for a Fortune 500 Company and might lose his job at any moment if he under performs, but his corporate management provides support and feedback that most schools do not&#8211;full-time managers who oversee 5 or 6 reports, administrative assistants, extensive yearly reviews, etc.  </p>
<p>Tenure (which ought only to be awarded after fair and rigorous process) allows a teacher to concentrate on her class, voice her opinions without fear of reprisal, and to collaborate with other teachers.  We seem to have forgotten that a major reason for tenure was to protect teachers from possible misuses of administrative power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick R. Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/#comment-35191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick R. Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=10659#comment-35191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Rahmbo did to the teacher&#039;s union what Golden Tate did to that Dallas Cowboy&#039;s linebacker;

http://hisstoryisbunk.blogspot.com/2012/09/upon-further-review.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Rahmbo did to the teacher&#8217;s union what Golden Tate did to that Dallas Cowboy&#8217;s linebacker;</p>
<p><a href="http://hisstoryisbunk.blogspot.com/2012/09/upon-further-review.html" rel="nofollow">http://hisstoryisbunk.blogspot.com/2012/09/upon-further-review.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2012/09/19/in-chicago-phony-merit-pay-is-dead-long-live-true-merit-pay/#comment-35182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=10659#comment-35182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forcing standards, and accountability, on the district system is akin to teaching a bear to dance. They&#039;ll never be any good at it; it&#039;s a wonder that they can do it at all.

The irony is that it&#039;s not necessary to force standards and accountability on independent, i.e. charters, private, parochial, schools. As an inevitable function of competition standards will arise. 

Even in the presence of the dominant institution, the district-based public education system, informal standards have arisen. They&#039;re rough standards and barely merit the use of the word &quot;standards&quot; since they consist of nothing more then dissatisfaction with the district schools and the comparison inherent to the decision to enroll your child in any of the alternatives but that&#039;s a standard nonetheless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forcing standards, and accountability, on the district system is akin to teaching a bear to dance. They&#8217;ll never be any good at it; it&#8217;s a wonder that they can do it at all.</p>
<p>The irony is that it&#8217;s not necessary to force standards and accountability on independent, i.e. charters, private, parochial, schools. As an inevitable function of competition standards will arise. </p>
<p>Even in the presence of the dominant institution, the district-based public education system, informal standards have arisen. They&#8217;re rough standards and barely merit the use of the word &#8220;standards&#8221; since they consist of nothing more then dissatisfaction with the district schools and the comparison inherent to the decision to enroll your child in any of the alternatives but that&#8217;s a standard nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
