Jay’s Laws

March 31, 2010

For anyone interested in pursuing an intellectual career, I have three laws to suggest:

1) Never say anything you don’t believe.  This may sound obvious, but I’m struck by how many people in academia and think-tankdom tailor their comments to please others while deviating from their true beliefs.  Remember, we aren’t politicians, so we don’t have to lie.  Some people get confused and think that they are politicians and craft what they say to produce a desired result as opposed to expressing their sincere convictions.  Being able to say what you think is true is the one great compensation of an intellectual life so don’t throw it away to fit in with colleagues, please a funder, or to fool the public or politicians into doing something you want.

2) Never work with people with whom you do not want to be working.  This law is harder to obey, especially earlier in one’s career, but please keep it in mind as an important goal to reach as soon as possible.  People who work primarily for money have to put up with a lot, including nasty colleagues, because they feel obliged to do whatever get’s them more money.  People who pursue an intellectual career should be primarily interested in ideas, not money.  Since jerks as colleagues tend not to contribute to the development of your ideas and since their jerkiness distracts you from developing your own ideas, you should get as far away from them as quickly as you can.

3) Never work on projects that you don’t think matter.  I’m not suggesting that every project needs to change the world, but you should see the projects on which you work as part of a broader intellectual agenda that has the potential to affect the world.  If you work on projects that you don’t think have any effect on the world, then you will have a hard time caring about it.  And if you don’t care about it, why should anyone else?  You’ll probably also do a lousy job if even you don’t care about it.  Besides, if you want to work on stuff you don’t care about you might as well work in a law firm or something else that pays better but does not require you to care.


Yes, It Was Kabuki

March 31, 2010

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

Sometimes first impressions turn out to be right. Back when the Obama administration started making noises about using the big new geyser of fedreal funds to reward innovative states – before anyone was even talking about “Race to the Top” – I saw right through the whole sham. Kabuki, I called it.

Then I began to have doubts. Bloomberg and Klein were fighting hard for charters, using RttT as leverage. Schwarzenegger got legislation in California repealing their charter cap. It began to look like RttT, while it would have some negative impacts, would also have some positive impacts. That would mean, whatever it was, it wasn’t kabuki.

I recant! I repent!

Delaware and Tennessee have some of the nation’s weaker charter laws. Whatever benefit there might have been for the charter movement in the first round of RttT came from tricking people into thinking the administration was serious about supporting charters. I admit I was fooled myself. But now that the dime has dropped, the charter cause has been seriously damaged in the long term. No state will stick its neck out for charters now that they know the administration views charters as less important than union support. Even the symbolic victory of having a president who at least puts on a show of embracing charter schools, choice and competition, etc. won’t survive this kind of collision with reality.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call kabuki.

So, Jay . . . how long do I need to wear sackcloth?


Card Check Comes to Ed Reform

March 30, 2010

(Guest post by Greg Forster)

That 1980s “union label” video sure is a classic, Jay. But in the wake of the RTTT results, education reformers feel more like this:

They couldn’t get card check passed through Congress, so they hauled it over to the DOE. Now we can watch the magic!


Look for the Union Label in Your Ed Reform

March 29, 2010

Given teacher union ability to block applications for Race to the Top, here’s the new ad campaign for the program:


Blocking the Race to the Top

March 29, 2010

Well, I was wrong in suggesting that Race to the Top money would be spread around to everyone, but I was right in suggesting that RTTT is a largely meaningless exercise.  It turns out that it is meaningless because union opposition to state plans essentially disqualified those states from winning the money.  Only Delaware and Tennessee received money in this round because union opposition blocked the other states.  According to the Wall Street Journal:

The administration appeared to put a very high value on applications that had won wide support from unions and school boards within their states. Florida’s bid, for instance, received the support of just 8% of its unions.

If people know that union opposition scuttles a state’s chances, then no state will apply in the future unless they have union support.  This means that the unions will dictate what reforms will be pursued, which means that there will be virtually no reform.  This enhancement of union power also undermines the rhetorical effects that RTTT had by narrowing state and local policy debate to those measures acceptable to the unions.


Lost Time

March 26, 2010

I apologize for the absence of a Lost post over the last few weeks.  Much has happened and we know much more than when I last posted.

My speculation that the show may flip and have Smokey be the good one and Jacob be the bad guy seems very, very  unlikely at this point.  That being said, I think it would be a mistake to see Jacob and Smokey as simply good versus evil.  They are not gods representing pure evil or good.  It’s clear that they are/were human beings with all of the complexity that human characters have.

What we know is that Smokey wants to get off the Island and Jacob is determined to keep him there.  Jacob says that if Smokey get’s off the Island some very bad things will happen.  He’s probably right, but we don’t know for sure.

The only way for Smokey to get off the Island is for Jacob to be killed and not replaced.  Jacob is already dead so now the issue is whether one of the 6 candidates will replace Jacob before Smokey can leave.  Smokey can’t directly kill any of the candidates but he can corrupt them or perhaps kill them through proxies. 

Smokey’s method of corruption is to know people’s minds and histories and offer them something they really want.  Often the thing he offers is to be reunited with a dead loved one.  Smokey can appear in the form of that dead loved one to tempt the person.  As I’ve suggested before, all dead people we see walking around the Island are actually Smokey.  The only exception to that is that Hurley has the power to see actual dead people, like Jacob and Isabella at the end of the last episode.  If only Hurley can see the dead person, it really is that person. 

Smokey probably needs some physical item from the dead person to appear as that person.  Most often the body of the dead person is on the Island.  But in the case of Isabella, he probably used her cross to appear as her.

Smokey has offered other things to corrupt people.  He offered Ben power to rule the Island after he leaves, but Ben refused.  He offered Sawyer transport off the Island.  Smokey appears to keep his word, but often his deals are less attractive than they seem.  Generally, what he offers is bad.

Just because what Smokey offers is generally bad and just because his escape from the Island may lead to bad things, does not make him pure evil.  First, Smokey has reasons for being as he is, which we will learn over the next several episodes.  We already know that he has a “crazy mother” and is still “working on” things related to that.  I’d be surprised if Smokey’ mom were someone other than a character we’ve already seen, since that would be introducing a major character very late in the story.  It’s possible that Claire is really his mother and he is Aaron.  Another possibility is Eloise Hawkins, but my money is on Claire.

Second, it’s not clear that Jacob is less manipulative than Smokey.  Jacob says that he wants people to be good without his intervention, while Smokey corrupts everyone.  But Jacob is the one who hands Sawyer the pen to write his revenge note.  Jacob is the one facilitates Kate’s running ways.  Just because Jacob does some of his manipulation through proxies, such as Hurley or Richard, doesn’t make him less manipulative.  Also, Jacob says that he believes in choice and free will while Smokey believes in fate.  Smokey says the opposite.  We don’t know exactly how this all will play out.

Third, while Smokey killed Jacob, it also appears likely that Jacob (or a proxy) killed Smokey.  We know that Smokey lost his body and had to take over Locke’s form.  Both Smokey and Jacob’s proxy, Dogen, sought to kill the other with a special knife before the person could speak.

It’s not clear how Widmore and Hanso (the owner of the Black Rock and the backer of the Dharma project and Sun’s father’s company) fit into this struggle between Jacob and Smokey.  I would guess that they are not on either side and are in it for themselves.  The Widmore and Hanso connection to the Island also goes back a long, long way (did anyone else notice that the man who took Ricardo as a slave was named Widfield — pretty close to Widmore?).

Someone or something is in the locked room on the sub.  I’m guessing it is Aaron or baby Kwon.

I also don’t know how the parallel world will merge with the Island world, but they somehow will.  The parallel world looks generally better and that is the one where the Island is underwater and the 6 candidates never went to the Island.  This raises questions about Jacob’s claim that the Island is a stopper keeping bad from the world.

Ultimately, I think we are going to learn that both Jacob and Smokey play necessary roles in the world.  There is a balance between choice and fate, good and evil, so both of them need to exist.  There is also a recurring theme about people needing to work out their issues.  The good people work them out while the bad people can’t let go of their problems.

Only 7 more episodes to go — until there is another 2 hour episode (and probably a movie sequel).


Newscast from the Florida Rally

March 25, 2010

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)


The World Turned Upside Down: Vouchers Pass Illinois Senate

March 25, 2010

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Senator Meeks’ voucher bill for Chicago just passed the Illinois Senate 33-20.

Color me amazed.


Progress on the Achievement Gap

March 25, 2010

 

(Guest Post by Matthew Ladner)

Loyal JPGB customers may recall one o f the earliest posts about how I went on an adventure in Oregon, noticed that everyone looked Anglo and wealthy, and asked What’s the Matter with Oregon? when I looked at their NAEP test scores.

Well, by way of update, Florida’s Hispanic students tied the statewide average for Anglo students on 4th grade reading in 2009. In fact, the exceeded or tied Anglo students in five states: Louisiana, Nevada, Oklahoma, Oregon and West Virginia.

Florida’s Hispanics scored within a couple of points of Anglo students in huge number of states, including Iowa and Maine.

My first reaction?

BOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My second reaction: somebody travel out to Oregon and wake up the policymakers. It’s a beautiful state you’ve got out there, but granola and illiteracy don’t mix terribly well.


Teacher Union Smackdown Video

March 25, 2010

If you’d like to see the debate on whether teacher unions are to blame for failing public schools, you can watch a video here.  Just click on the tab that says “Audio/Video.”  It’s better in living color than in a transcript.