<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash for Crest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaypgreene.com/2009/08/06/cash-for-crest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/08/06/cash-for-crest/</link>
	<description>With Help From Some Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 14:40:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash For Clunkers Creates No New Net Economic Activity &#124; Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/08/06/cash-for-crest/#comment-6002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash For Clunkers Creates No New Net Economic Activity &#124; Sarah Palin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=4218#comment-6002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] - Jay P. Greene [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Jay P. Greene [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/08/06/cash-for-crest/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=4218#comment-6000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly, I think there would be plenty of people to support that idea...especially among homeowners in Vegas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I think there would be plenty of people to support that idea&#8230;especially among homeowners in Vegas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay P. Greene</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/08/06/cash-for-crest/#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay P. Greene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=4218#comment-5999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about if we have a government program to pay people for older houses and then blow the houses up.  We&#039;d reduce the oversupply of housing and we&#039;d have some great stock footage for action flicks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about if we have a government program to pay people for older houses and then blow the houses up.  We&#8217;d reduce the oversupply of housing and we&#8217;d have some great stock footage for action flicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/08/06/cash-for-crest/#comment-5996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=4218#comment-5996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve tried to explain to people that you cannot A) overpay for a car with a government subsidy, then B) crush the car turning into a pile of scrap metal and C)  assume that the program is a complete success adding to the wealth of the country by ignoring the fact that you destroyed a perfectly  useable clunker with $4,500 that could have been used to purchase something else.

In the best case scenario the country is out one useable clunker each time the program is used. That is a net loss!

It goes right over some people’s heads. Even after I explain this they still think it’s a success because car sales are up. I’m like, hello, cars are not the only thing you can buy in this country!

On that note, back to education reform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried to explain to people that you cannot A) overpay for a car with a government subsidy, then B) crush the car turning into a pile of scrap metal and C)  assume that the program is a complete success adding to the wealth of the country by ignoring the fact that you destroyed a perfectly  useable clunker with $4,500 that could have been used to purchase something else.</p>
<p>In the best case scenario the country is out one useable clunker each time the program is used. That is a net loss!</p>
<p>It goes right over some people’s heads. Even after I explain this they still think it’s a success because car sales are up. I’m like, hello, cars are not the only thing you can buy in this country!</p>
<p>On that note, back to education reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

