<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Supreme Court&#8217;s Special-Ed Vouchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaypgreene.com/2009/06/24/the-supreme-courts-special-ed-vouchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/06/24/the-supreme-courts-special-ed-vouchers/</link>
	<description>With Help From Some Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Forster</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/06/24/the-supreme-courts-special-ed-vouchers/#comment-5453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Forster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=3855#comment-5453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, but should the court implement the law on that basis? If not, what should it do instead? That&#039;s the more difficult question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but should the court implement the law on that basis? If not, what should it do instead? That&#8217;s the more difficult question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/06/24/the-supreme-courts-special-ed-vouchers/#comment-5448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=3855#comment-5448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, Congress intended to require parents to either accept an inadequate public-school education or pay for an adequate private education with their own money. But that just means Congress is out to benefit their friends at the expense of everyone else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Congress intended to require parents to either accept an inadequate public-school education or pay for an adequate private education with their own money. But that just means Congress is out to benefit their friends at the expense of everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay P. Greene</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/06/24/the-supreme-courts-special-ed-vouchers/#comment-5443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay P. Greene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=3855#comment-5443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Scalia is so concered with original intent, who does he focus on the fiscal implications (which the minority incorrectly calculated)?  Shouldn&#039;t the fiscal implications be a matter for policymakers to decide, not judges?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Scalia is so concered with original intent, who does he focus on the fiscal implications (which the minority incorrectly calculated)?  Shouldn&#8217;t the fiscal implications be a matter for policymakers to decide, not judges?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

