<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assassination for D.C. Vouchers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaypgreene.com/2009/02/25/assassination-for-dc-vouchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/02/25/assassination-for-dc-vouchers/</link>
	<description>With Help From Some Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Forster</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/02/25/assassination-for-dc-vouchers/#comment-3747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Forster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=2610#comment-3747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoops, thanks for catching that, guys. Post updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, thanks for catching that, guys. Post updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/02/25/assassination-for-dc-vouchers/#comment-3742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=2610#comment-3742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is in the proposed omnibus bill, not the stimulus package.  I believe it has only passed in the House.  

Technically it is like a sunset clause to the program--money will not be appropriated to the voucher program unless the program is reauthorized.  Yes, I know that is just another way of saying &quot;assassination.&quot;  But it isn&#039;t law yet.  

Keep in mind that even if the &quot;assassination&quot; attempt does not become part of the law, the ability to kill it by not appropriating funds is ever-present.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is in the proposed omnibus bill, not the stimulus package.  I believe it has only passed in the House.  </p>
<p>Technically it is like a sunset clause to the program&#8211;money will not be appropriated to the voucher program unless the program is reauthorized.  Yes, I know that is just another way of saying &#8220;assassination.&#8221;  But it isn&#8217;t law yet.  </p>
<p>Keep in mind that even if the &#8220;assassination&#8221; attempt does not become part of the law, the ability to kill it by not appropriating funds is ever-present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/02/25/assassination-for-dc-vouchers/#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Sheldon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=2610#comment-3740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;snuck a provision&quot;

No parsing using English rules will make that make any sense.

They shoveled that an myriad other such features in by the shitbucket load.  Wide open to all who were willing to look.

They did make sure that nobody who might do anything about it got to look, but that is not &quot;sneak&quot;, that is Three Card Monte.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;snuck a provision&#8221;</p>
<p>No parsing using English rules will make that make any sense.</p>
<p>They shoveled that an myriad other such features in by the shitbucket load.  Wide open to all who were willing to look.</p>
<p>They did make sure that nobody who might do anything about it got to look, but that is not &#8220;sneak&#8221;, that is Three Card Monte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Benefield</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2009/02/25/assassination-for-dc-vouchers/#comment-3739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Benefield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.com/?p=2610#comment-3739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg,

Is the provision to kill the DC program in the stimulus bill (that already passed) or the omnibus spending bill (still in early stages of debate, so there is time to fight it)?

My understanding and reading of the Lips and Enlow piece is that it is the latter, but the stimulus bill precludes any of the new funding to be used for school choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>Is the provision to kill the DC program in the stimulus bill (that already passed) or the omnibus spending bill (still in early stages of debate, so there is time to fight it)?</p>
<p>My understanding and reading of the Lips and Enlow piece is that it is the latter, but the stimulus bill precludes any of the new funding to be used for school choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

