<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/</link>
	<description>With Help From Some Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: We’re #1! &#124; Cato @ Liberty</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-16065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[We’re #1! &#124; Cato @ Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-16065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the most interesting (and voluminous) education research in the country—today published the most important finding of his career: When it comes to readership, Cato@Liberty.org crushes all other education [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the most interesting (and voluminous) education research in the country—today published the most important finding of his career: When it comes to readership, <a href="mailto:Cato@Liberty.org">Cato@Liberty.org</a> crushes all other education [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who will make the statistics sing? Meet Professor Aaron Pallas &#124; GothamSchools</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-3417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who will make the statistics sing? Meet Professor Aaron Pallas &#124; GothamSchools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-3417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] whose data analysis often contradicted Department of Education claims, signed off this morning. Her many fans are now declaring a collective [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whose data analysis often contradicted Department of Education claims, signed off this morning. Her many fans are now declaring a collective [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an education PR person, let me see if I can add anything - accurate counts of site traffic are notoriously hard to come by.  There are lots of reasons for this, but it&#039;s really hard to say definitively &quot;blog X has more traffic than blog Y&quot; unless there is a clear difference between several of these metrics.  Paul&#039;s caveats about the RSS feeds are good ones, to which I&#039;d add another: that only counts who has added your feed, not necessarily the number of people visiting regularly.  Also, some populations might be more inclined to use RSS than others, which would skew the results (though I don&#039;t know that I can think of compelling arguments for the bloggers listed). 

Jay, your friend&#039;s comment is, I believe, mostly correct.  The authority rankings take into account things like back-links, which a big site might encourage, either purposefully or just because you have bloggers who know each other.    For what it&#039;s worth I believe they also take into account things like number of comments.  

I&#039;m not sure how the big media clipping services do it, but I know I&#039;ve seen them pick up Cato, Joanne, Eduwonk, and the Ed Week blogs.  

Basically your blog has definitely grown impressively over the last year, and your blog is most likely bigger than some (CK, Ed Biz), smaller than some (Joanne, Cato), and in the same neighborhood as others.  Think of these numbers as having somewhat large margins of error.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an education PR person, let me see if I can add anything &#8211; accurate counts of site traffic are notoriously hard to come by.  There are lots of reasons for this, but it&#8217;s really hard to say definitively &#8220;blog X has more traffic than blog Y&#8221; unless there is a clear difference between several of these metrics.  Paul&#8217;s caveats about the RSS feeds are good ones, to which I&#8217;d add another: that only counts who has added your feed, not necessarily the number of people visiting regularly.  Also, some populations might be more inclined to use RSS than others, which would skew the results (though I don&#8217;t know that I can think of compelling arguments for the bloggers listed). </p>
<p>Jay, your friend&#8217;s comment is, I believe, mostly correct.  The authority rankings take into account things like back-links, which a big site might encourage, either purposefully or just because you have bloggers who know each other.    For what it&#8217;s worth I believe they also take into account things like number of comments.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the big media clipping services do it, but I know I&#8217;ve seen them pick up Cato, Joanne, Eduwonk, and the Ed Week blogs.  </p>
<p>Basically your blog has definitely grown impressively over the last year, and your blog is most likely bigger than some (CK, Ed Biz), smaller than some (Joanne, Cato), and in the same neighborhood as others.  Think of these numbers as having somewhat large margins of error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul DiPerna</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul DiPerna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick correction, Eduwonk has 466 subscribers, not 273...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick correction, Eduwonk has 466 subscribers, not 273&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul DiPerna</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul DiPerna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using a different metric, &quot;feed subscribers&quot;, below are Google Feed Rankings for the blogs above and some other K-12 affairs blogs.   


1.   Cato at Liberty               470
2.   Eduwonk                          273
3.   Class Struggle (Jay Mathews)   213 
4.   Education Sector            183
5.   Quick and the Ed            169
6.   Joanne Jacobs                163
7.   Eduwonkette                   142
8.   Edspresso                       135
9.   Bridging Differences       127
10. D-Ed Reckoning              113
11. Out of Control                 112
12. Education Policy Blog     107
13. Edwize                               87
14. Flypaper                            60
15. Sherman Dorn                   49
16. Jay P. Greene                    46
17. This Week in Education (Alexander Russo)     36
18. EdBizBuzz                         29
19. Core Knowledge               14


These rankings are based on the total # of RSS feed subscribers, and I believe these are subscribers only using Google Reader...  I&#039;m pretty sure these numbers do not represent all RSS subscribers to a given blog or column.  That&#039;s an important caveat to make since there are a number of other feed readers out there. 

I think the Google Rankings still offer a good impression of subscriber reach for K-12 blogs and columns.   I wouldn&#039;t expect  a systematic bias for one blog over another based on what RSS feed reader one uses.   

On the other hand, the &quot;age&quot; for a given blog feed is an important consideration when judging the above rankings and numbers...  

Relatively new blogs (e.g. this one), or blogs who have recently changed hosts/feeds (e.g. Russo&#039;s TWIE), maybe should be given some asterisks as they ramp up subscribers in their first year or so.  My guess is that about 6-12 months is required for these kinds of blogs to penetrate by word of mouth and to be on a level playing field (in terms of awareness) with older blogs.  A full year of blogging, exchanging links, exchanging comments with other blogs, buzz at conferences, publications, events, etc, I think should do the trick to get the proper word out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a different metric, &#8220;feed subscribers&#8221;, below are Google Feed Rankings for the blogs above and some other K-12 affairs blogs.   </p>
<p>1.   Cato at Liberty               470<br />
2.   Eduwonk                          273<br />
3.   Class Struggle (Jay Mathews)   213<br />
4.   Education Sector            183<br />
5.   Quick and the Ed            169<br />
6.   Joanne Jacobs                163<br />
7.   Eduwonkette                   142<br />
8.   Edspresso                       135<br />
9.   Bridging Differences       127<br />
10. D-Ed Reckoning              113<br />
11. Out of Control                 112<br />
12. Education Policy Blog     107<br />
13. Edwize                               87<br />
14. Flypaper                            60<br />
15. Sherman Dorn                   49<br />
16. Jay P. Greene                    46<br />
17. This Week in Education (Alexander Russo)     36<br />
18. EdBizBuzz                         29<br />
19. Core Knowledge               14</p>
<p>These rankings are based on the total # of RSS feed subscribers, and I believe these are subscribers only using Google Reader&#8230;  I&#8217;m pretty sure these numbers do not represent all RSS subscribers to a given blog or column.  That&#8217;s an important caveat to make since there are a number of other feed readers out there. </p>
<p>I think the Google Rankings still offer a good impression of subscriber reach for K-12 blogs and columns.   I wouldn&#8217;t expect  a systematic bias for one blog over another based on what RSS feed reader one uses.   </p>
<p>On the other hand, the &#8220;age&#8221; for a given blog feed is an important consideration when judging the above rankings and numbers&#8230;  </p>
<p>Relatively new blogs (e.g. this one), or blogs who have recently changed hosts/feeds (e.g. Russo&#8217;s TWIE), maybe should be given some asterisks as they ramp up subscribers in their first year or so.  My guess is that about 6-12 months is required for these kinds of blogs to penetrate by word of mouth and to be on a level playing field (in terms of awareness) with older blogs.  A full year of blogging, exchanging links, exchanging comments with other blogs, buzz at conferences, publications, events, etc, I think should do the trick to get the proper word out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We???re #1! &#124; Think Tank West</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[We???re #1! &#124; Think Tank West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the most interesting (and voluminous) education research in the country???today published the most important finding??of his career: When it comes to readership, Cato@Liberty.org crushes all other education [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the most interesting (and voluminous) education research in the country???today published the most important finding??of his career: When it comes to readership, <a href="mailto:Cato@Liberty.org">Cato@Liberty.org</a> crushes all other education [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay P. Greene</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay P. Greene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers are supposed to be the rank of the blog, with 1 being the highest ranked.  I&#039;ve heard from a friend who is more informed about all of this than I am that there are problems with these Technorati numbers.  He says that they are distorted by being hosted by a site with significant traffic, which might artificially improve rankings for the Ed Week hosted sites Eduwonkette and Bridging Differences and for the Cato hosted Cato at Liberty.  He also says that these are &quot;authority&quot; rankings, not readership rankings, where authority has something to do with how many other sites link to you.  His bottom line is that jaypgreene.com is actually doing much better than these rankings would suggest.  I have no way of assessing what he says, but since he says nice things he is certainly correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers are supposed to be the rank of the blog, with 1 being the highest ranked.  I&#8217;ve heard from a friend who is more informed about all of this than I am that there are problems with these Technorati numbers.  He says that they are distorted by being hosted by a site with significant traffic, which might artificially improve rankings for the Ed Week hosted sites Eduwonkette and Bridging Differences and for the Cato hosted Cato at Liberty.  He also says that these are &#8220;authority&#8221; rankings, not readership rankings, where authority has something to do with how many other sites link to you.  His bottom line is that jaypgreene.com is actually doing much better than these rankings would suggest.  I have no way of assessing what he says, but since he says nice things he is certainly correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewladner</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/07/14/blog-rankings/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matthewladner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I give up- what do the numbers mean?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I give up- what do the numbers mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

