<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Equal and More Excellent? Yes, We Can!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaypgreene.com/2008/06/19/more-equal-and-more-excellent-yes-we-can/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/06/19/more-equal-and-more-excellent-yes-we-can/</link>
	<description>With Help From Some Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What about the smart kids? at Joanne Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/06/19/more-equal-and-more-excellent-yes-we-can/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What about the smart kids? at Joanne Jacobs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Yes we can have more equity and more excellence, writes Jay Greene. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes we can have more equity and more excellence, writes Jay Greene. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Forster</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/06/19/more-equal-and-more-excellent-yes-we-can/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Forster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks - as you have surmised, my post was not intended to engage with the actual merits of Checker and Mike&#039;s evidence, but to point out that even if we stipulate that evidence, it doesn&#039;t mean what they think it means. Whether we should in fact stipulate it is a question on which I am saying nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; as you have surmised, my post was not intended to engage with the actual merits of Checker and Mike&#8217;s evidence, but to point out that even if we stipulate that evidence, it doesn&#8217;t mean what they think it means. Whether we should in fact stipulate it is a question on which I am saying nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parry</title>
		<link>http://jaypgreene.com/2008/06/19/more-equal-and-more-excellent-yes-we-can/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaypgreene.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A post over at The Quick and the Ed (http://www.quickanded.com/2008/06/those-tricky-charts_19.html) suggests that most of the gains of students in the lowest decile occurred pre-NCLB implementation. Not entirely relevant to your main point, but (I thought) worth noting nonetheless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A post over at The Quick and the Ed (<a href="http://www.quickanded.com/2008/06/those-tricky-charts_19.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.quickanded.com/2008/06/those-tricky-charts_19.html</a>) suggests that most of the gains of students in the lowest decile occurred pre-NCLB implementation. Not entirely relevant to your main point, but (I thought) worth noting nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

